Posted subsequent to reading David Chako's initial reports on
this topic via ## METHODI put my IVM Turtle [3] through 5000 trials doing 100-step random walks from (0,0,0,0). Each step involves randomly choosing from 1 of 12 IVM directions. My resulting table records ordinary straight-line distances, where a segment from (0,0,0,0) to the reference tet mid-edge is defined as unity, i.e. an IVM spoke or tet edge is root8 (~2.83).[4] I realize this is a different yardstick and distance computation from David's experiments, wherein the tetra edge is unity, but this alternative metric should not affect any underlying pattern we might find, in terms of distance distribution patterns about the origin. ## HYPOTHESISWhat I expect to find (my trials are running as I write this) is
some kind of distribution around an 'average radius' for 100-step
walks. Distances closer to or further away from the origin will
taper off in likelihood, giving us a distribution curve. What this
average distance will be I'm not sure, but I'm looking for a
function like: avgdist(100,0.2) would narrow the radial band to 20% and avgdist(100) would be some ideal average. Then we could graph avgdist(x) where x=number of steps in a random walk, maybe even come up with some algebraic rule. ## RESULTSAverage distance: 25.88 Distance attained most often: 17.20 (87 hits) Mininum distance: 0.00 ( 1 hit) Maximum distance: 71.05 ( 1 hit) ## CONCLUSIONSI guess I'm not seeing anything striking or unusual -- looks like a statistical distribution we might expect. But I'm not using huge numbers and may not have a fine precision enough approach to pick up relevant patterns. I don't have any expression for avgdist yet -- more trials required. ## FURTHER THOUGHTSSince we're confining positions to IVM sphere centers, many real number distances from the origin will never occur. Graphed against positive real distances, the pattern will always appear 'spikey' simply because the turtle is hitting a small subset of the potential radii. Of course the frequency of the IVM relative to our unit-length is going to determine whether we see this atomic discreteness. In the case of a high frequency IVM, the distribution may be so fine-grained as to appear smooth (grains of sand are any distance you require, provided your ruler isn't too finely calibrated). How this work relates to diffusion patterns within an ideal gas
remains open to speculation. A numbering scheme along the lines of
## EXHIBITSome of the code: procedure randstudy lparameters iter oTurtle=CREATEOBJECT("ivmTurtle") local k use randbase for k = 1 to iter && iter set to 5000 for this write-up do randomwalk append blank && adding a record to trials table * e parameter says which edge in reference system is unity replace iterno with k, distance with oTurtle.saypos("e") endfor release oTurtle use return procedure randomwalk =rand(-1) && seed the generator oTurtle.setorigin() for i=1 to 100 ivmdir = mod(int(1+1000*rand()),12)+1 && between 1 & 12 oTurtle.vemov(ivmdir) endfor return ## ENDNOTES[1] IVM = isotropic vector matrix -- lattice connecting sphere centers in an fcc packing. [2] A reference tetrahedron body-centered at the origin defines two sets of rays: 4 'v-rays' from origin to vertices and 6 'e-rays' to mid-edges. The XYZ coordinate addressing scheme is based on e-rays whereas Chako's scheme uses 4-tuples (1,0,0,0)(0,1,0,0)(0,0,1,0)(0,0,0,1) to identify the v-rays, which may be scaled and summed positively to specify any point in space. For converting back and forth to/from XYZ, the following conventions are used: v1 = ( 1, 0, 0, 0) = ( 1, 1, 1) = e1 + e3 + e5 v2 = ( 0, 1, 0, 0) = ( 1,-1,-1) = e1 + e4 + e6 v3 = ( 0, 0, 1, 0) = (-1, 1,-1) = e2 + e3 + e6 v4 = ( 0, 0, 0, 1) = (-1,-1, 1) = e2 + e4 + e5 where: e1 = +x e2 = -x e3 = +y e4 = -y e5 = +z e6 = -z According to this scheme, the 12 directions from any IVM sphere center to neighboring sphere center are specified as: (2,0,1,1)(2,1,0,1)(2,1,1,0) (0,2,1,1)(1,2,0,1)(1,2,1,0) (0,1,2,1)(1,0,2,1)(1,1,2,0) (0,1,1,2)(1,0,1,2)(1,1,0,2) Since this paper was first published to the web in January,
1997, I have altered my strategy for converting to and from
Cartesian coordinates and now use the following identities:
[4] The center-to-midedge segment is likewise half the edge of a cube inside of which the reference tetrahedron is inscribed (as face diagonals). A cube with an edge of 2e has face diagonals of e * root8, which is our reference tetrahedron (e=1). The reference tetrahedron is volumetric unity as given by Gerald de Jong's modification of Euler's expression deriving any tetrahedron's volume from its 6 edges, what he calls his Sublimation Theorem (requires a Java-enabled browser).
Synergetics on the
Web |